Airlines may now ban you for not wearing a face mask
Photo by Free To Use Sounds on Unsplash

One of the major things that has been keeping me from getting on an airplane is the fact that many travelers are not wearing their face masks as they’re supposed to. Sadly, not wearing a face mask has become a political statement (thanks to the President of the USA for not leading by example).

Research has shown that wearing a face mask greatly reduces the risk of COVID-19 infection. In fact, writes Reuters, “mask-wearing is even more important for preventing the virus’ spread and the sometimes deadly COVID-19 illness it causes than social distancing and stay-at-home orders, researchers said, in the study published in PNAS: The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA.”

Well, there’s been a big change. In a statement yesterday by Airlines for America (A4A), an industry trade organization representing Alaska Airlines, American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Hawaiian Airlines, JetBlue, Southwest Airlines, and United Airlines, each of these airlines announced that it will be implementing the following policy updates regarding face coverings:

  • Preflight Communications: Each airline will clearly articulate its individual face covering policy in communications with customers, which may require passengers to acknowledge the specific rules during the check-in process.
  • Onboard Announcements: Onboard the aircraft, crew members will announce specific details regarding the carrier’s face covering policy including the consequences passengers could face for violating the policy.
  • Consequences for Noncompliance: Each carrier will determine the appropriate consequences for passengers who are found to be in noncompliance of the airline’s face covering policy up to and including suspension of flying privileges on that airline.

Yes, a “suspension of flying privileges” is now on the table if you don’t follow airline face mask rules.

United Airlines sent out a separate press release yesterday stating that “it will strengthen mandatory mask policies to further mitigate against the spread of COVID-19 and help continue to keep passengers and crew safe. While the overwhelming majority of passengers are complying with United’s mandatory policy, starting on June 18, any passenger that does not comply when onboard a United flight will be placed on an internal travel restriction list. Customers on this list will lose their travel privileges on United for a duration of time to be determined pending a comprehensive incident review.

“United currently requires all passengers to wear a face covering onboard its flights and expects that policy to remain in place for at least the next 60 days. The only exceptions to this policy are individuals who have a medical condition or a disability that prevents them from wearing a face covering, those who cannot put on or remove a face covering themselves and small children. Customers are expected to wear a mask for the duration of the flight, except when eating or drinking.”

The press release continues: “Under this new policy, if a flight attendant notices or is informed of a customer onboard who is not wearing a face covering and that passenger does not fall within an exception, the flight attendant will proactively inform the customer that for the health and safety of everyone, face coverings are mandatory for all customers and crew on board. They will also offer to provide the customer with a mask if needed. If the customer continues to be non-compliant, flight attendants will do their best to de-escalate the situation, again inform the customer of United’s policy, and provide the passenger with an In-Flight Mask policy reminder card. If a customer continues to not comply, the flight attendant will file a report of the incident, which will initiate a formal review process. Any final decision or actions regarding a customer’s future flight benefits will not occur onboard but instead take place after the flight has reached its destination and the security team has investigated the incident.”

My take on the new potential punishments for not wearing a face mask on a flight

I’m happy to see that United and the other airlines are really going to step up their policing of the use of masks. I’ve spoken to multiple doctors about the value of masks and they’ve all told me they’d rather treat COVID-19 patients than fly on a plane. That’s because on a plane people aren’t in PPE; they’re in an enclosed space and many feel their rights are being infringed upon when they’re told they have to wear a mask. Now, if you don’t wear a mask you risk being banned from an airline. (You know there’s going to be a case soon when there’s an emergency landing because a passenger won’t comply or a fight breaks out over the rule.)

Once all passengers start wearing masks over their mouths and nose, I’ll feel much better about flying.

 


Have your own tip? Email it to whitney@johnnyjet.com!
Want to see more tips? Click here for all 1,731!

Want even more travel tips? Sign up here for the Daily Travel Tip newsletter! Enter your email address and check “Daily Travel Tip” to receive Johnny’s best tips in your inbox each day!

If you already subscribe to our weekly newsletter, you can sign up on the same page. Just fill in your email and check “Daily Travel Tip” on the same page. You’ll receive an email with a link to update your JohnnyJet.com preferences. On that page, just click the Daily Travel Tip box and Update Profile.

Johnny Jet
Advertisement

Chase Sapphire Preferred® Card

recommended-cart-post-image
APPLY NOW
  • Earn 80,000 bonus points after you spend $4,000 on purchases in the first 3 months from account opening. That's $1,000 toward travel when you redeem through Chase Ultimate Rewards®.
  • 2X points on travel and dining at restaurants worldwide, eligible delivery services, takeout and dining out & 1 point per dollar spent on all other purchases.
  • Get 25% more value when you redeem for airfare, hotels, car rentals and cruises through Chase Ultimate Rewards. For example, 80,000 points are worth $1,000 toward travel.
  • Get unlimited deliveries with a $0 delivery fee and reduced service fees on orders over $12 for a minimum of one year on qualifying food purchases with DashPass, DoorDash's subscription service. Activate by 12/31/21.
  • Earn 5X points on Lyft rides through March 2022. That’s 3X points in addition to the 2X points you already earn on travel.

The comments on this page are not provided, reviewed, or otherwise approved by the bank advertiser. It is not the bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Editorial Note: The editorial content on this page is not provided by any bank, credit card issuer, airlines or hotel chain, and has not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any of these entities.

11 Comments On "Airlines May Now Ban You for Not Wearing a Face Mask"
  1. David Miller|

    Do yourself a favor – keep your political remarks to yourself.

    1. Johnny Jet
      Johnny Jet|

      That wasn’t a political statement – it was a fact.

  2. R Johnson|

    You’re entitled to post anything to your own blog – but your views mean ZERO to me, just as my views mean ZERO to you.

    I am scheduled to fly to Denver on July 3 on Delta. I have a KN95 mask for the process. I EXPECT that Delta will require the same level or higher for this flight. A face covering is not enough. It will be interesting at the airport if they are not requiring a high level of protection for flyers.

    1. Johnny Jet
      Johnny Jet|

      Not many people will be wearing N95 masks. They should and I think it will be the future but they don’t want to take N95 away from healthcare workers so they’re just giving out regular masks.

  3. Robin|

    If you’d been paying attention, you’d realize that the advice for wearing masks has been all over the place. If I’m made to wear them on a plane, I will, but not because I have been convinced by the WHO or CDC or Trump or you or anyone that they’re needy. We may prevent a few cases in the short term, while preserving this thing for a longer period of time because we don’t allow mass exposure.

  4. R. Shafer|

    It seems one can find rhetoric to suit their beliefs pro or con masks.
    Also, I clearly am not the only one who thought your comment was political, even though you say it was not.

  5. Matt|

    Johnny it was a political statement. Unsubscribing now. I don’t need to hear from you too.

    1. Johnny Jet
      Johnny Jet|

      Don’t let the Bunker Door hit you

  6. Chris|

    Just stick to travel and STFU.

  7. Suzana|

    Based solely on the fact that masks can stop bacteria from passing from one person to the next but are not effective in stopping viruses, which are too small & can only be seen with an electron microscope- Therefore it is useless & ridiculous to be forced to wear a mask & is basically nothing more than a false sense of security.

  8. liveFreeOrDie|

    The science is flawed. The study doesn’t actually test the effectiveness of face coverings physically. They make several assumptions and then “We quantified the effects of face-covering by projecting the number of infections based on the data prior to implementing the use of face masks in Italy on April 6 and NYC on April 17”. But there are a number of reasons why the numbers began to move downward. Social distancing, asymptomatic carriers that weren’t even tested, inaccurate testing, lack of testing, bad tests, etc. They never actually tested passing viruses (which can only be seen with electron microscopes) through normal face coverings. For instance, if someone is infected, and wearing a face covering and sneezes or coughs, does the virus get through or do facemasks stop them. Given the number of infected that should be very easy to test. Why hasn’t that been done? Because we all know these masks won’t stop the virus. It will stop big droplets of body fluids yes. But the virus will breeze right through. The only way to stop that from happening is with friggine hazmat suits. Until I see science that ACTUALLY TESTS the effectiveness of masks, you can keep your shoddy correlations. The very first sentence of that abstract tells us they are just guessing: “Various mitigation measures have been implemented to fight the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, including widely adopted social distancing and mandated face covering. However, assessing the effectiveness of those intervention practices hinges on the understanding of virus transmission, which remains uncertain.” You’re damn right it does.

Leave a Reply

Required fields are marked *